A Brave New World is Pending :: Brave New World Essays

A Brave wise World is pending    In the March 6 issue of Science News, J. Raloff wrote If pregnancies early in adulthood reduce a womans lifelong risk of developing dummy cancer, could short-term hormonal treatments that simulate aspects of pregnancy do the same matter? A new study suggest that the answer is yes.   Reading that fast-forwarded my visual sensation to a horrible future, one described in Aldous Huxleys Brave New World, where women of the future undergo surrogate pregnancies. In the book it was for mental reasons, exactly now, theres a physical reason to do such a hormonal treatment.   How many other predictions will come true in the next, say, 20 years? Already we have television, airplanes, submarines, cyberspace and virtual reality. Is the next whole tone a measurable move toward Utopia? Will we whole live with pure(a) health? Will we stave off death so effectively that we are killed for population control reasons at the old, old age of 60? Wi ll we lose sight of the goal of a long, productive life, forswear it for a long, for forever young life (making aging a disease, because drugs to invoke the here and now build up to a painful later)?   Im all for advancement in medicine. My own father, an oncologist and hematologist, deals with ground-breaking new procedures and medicines on a routine basis. But to air out my cautious side if the government ever starts worshiping Henry Ford, outlawing Shakespeare, instituting mandatory sterilization of certain groups of people, encouraging and perpetuating class divisions and distributing drugs to exercise potential conflict, help me out by saying STOP real, really loudly.   Then again, this government does revere Henry Ford in a way. If a grownup car company wanted something done that was reverse gear to the desires of a community, my bets are on the car company. This thorough encouragement of big business and the tradition of such can almost be seen as worship. &nbs p While Shakespeare hasnt been outlawed anywhere (as far as I know), program line Darwins theory of Natural Selection is banned in some give instruction districts. J.D. Salingers Catcher in the Rye is banned in some naturalize districts.   Ruth Sherman, a white teacher in a swarthy and Hispanic neighborhood in New York, left her job in fear for her life over a book called Nappy blur some parents (who of course, hadnt read the award-winning novel and for the most part werent her students parents) image it was racist and divisive.